Eyewitness Priscilla Adepa Addai-Kwarteng has clarified the complex Daddy Lumba marriage judgment today. Directly, she addressed the misinformation circulating on social media regarding the case. According to her account, the judge outlined three specific marriage types. Specifically, these categories include Islamic, customary, and ordinance unions in Ghana. Crucially, Her Ladyship emphasized that ordinance marriages remain strictly monogamous by law. Thus, a person cannot marry another while such a union subsists. However, the court questioned if Akosua Serwaa actually contracted an ordinance marriage.
Unfortunately, her lawyer failed to prove this essential fact in court. Instead, he tendered mere extracts rather than the original marriage certificate. Remarkably, the submitted Exhibits B and C contained two different dates. Furthermore, different marriage officers signed these inconsistent documents. Consequently, the judge rejected these papers as valid proof of marriage. In fact, no certificate bore the signatures of Lumba and Akosua together. Therefore, the court declared that Akosua Serwaa failed to prove her case.
As a result, the judge ruled that their union was purely customary. Legally, this specific status allows Daddy Lumba to marry multiple wives. Essentially, the Daddy Lumba marriage judgment prioritized tangible evidence over emotional narratives. Moreover, the eyewitness noted that the law knows no emotion. Truly, court victories depend on what you can prove, not just truth. Now, public discourse questions if Akosua ever returned her dowry. If substantiated, that act would dissolve the customary marriage entirely. Additionally, observers ask why the court ignored the potential document deception. Finally, this detailed account settles the debate on the final verdict.
Source: Priscilla Adepa Addai – Kwarteng (Social Media)